You are reading and considering things that are in the research and study phase and while they (the researchers) may well be on to something, it could take decades before there is any practical value to the work

To give an example I would suggest that any diabetic google and read about the "Edmonton Protocol"

Back in 2000, 24 years ago, a team of researchers implanted a "pouch" in the arm of a Type 1, Insulin Dependent Diabetic, and filled it with Islet cells

The result - for well over a "decade" the (test subject) did not need another insulin injection

You might consider that a breakthrough and it is, but science and more particularly Medical Science moves slowly - too many hate Big Pharma and are chomping at the bit to sue the crap out of them if they make even a tiny, even unforeseeable error

A whole generation of Type 1's continue daily injections when a "possible/probable" solution might be available - but first they have to jump through a few million hoops before it will hit the market, if ever

In 2016 the Protocol was tested on 9 patients in a University of Chicago study. 5 patients dropped out and ended up with a number of side effects as residual to the immunosuppressants they took to prevent rejection of the treatment, the remaining Four discontinued use of Insulin completely over the next 5 years

The protocol works, but not without side effects - destroying your immune system just to avoid daily insulin injections may not be a good trade off for others, so the "treatment" is far from perfect

Even 24 years later study continues. MAYBE one day it will be effective and not cumbersome to take - a quarter century and it's still in the "design/test" phase

So you must take research with a pinch of reserve - it may work, it may cause consequences, it may or may not eventually do what the researchers were hoping for

First, i read this article, and i have a question on relation betwen, those 10 causes and the amont of cell debris that affect our organism, base on the study of Dr Choi. Hé said in SienceDaily: ramping dammaged celles out of the body helps heals diabetics bloods vessels. Is there possibility on effect on each one of those causes here
November 18 2019

I am not sûre to understand what you realy wat to tell us. But I am pretty sur of so much human heart that work realy hard to bring hope, for our freind from Sourth Africa WHO crie for help whith so much pain, he does nőt want to perish no. He loves the life. He ask for hope not for support to Died. I would like you please forgive me for some bad Word in my sentences, inglish is not my langage. I am sûre to nőt have anough kindness in my sentences, please, forgive me

My own life is now, not 24 years from now. Technology and accumulated experiences have given more performance to our medicine than you try to make us believe. Control over COVID19 is a good example. I am so proud of our doctors. Don't try to make me believe that all they can do is accompany us to death. it is also a lack of respect for the great work that our doctors do.

you are more apt to teach resignation to preach morality and to accompany poeple dying. . I asked my question to those who wrote the text cited above. people who are facing death now have no time to wait as you say. COVID 19 vaccines were rolled out in the blink of an eye.
Can you tell me about the cellular debris and undifferentiated cells that line our body: in old age, in chronic autoimmune diseases, in old age. Do you know someting about it? If not, it is not correct to try to block my questions.
t is a question about the relationship that exists between the ten causes of blindness in diabetes and the mountains of dead cells that hyperglycemia produces. , old age and chronic injuries. why want to answer if you don't know and when the question is not addressed to you?
What interest pushes you to want to block the question?This is not the study of Dr. Soo Kyoung Choi that I want to promote, my personal experiences have shown that the result of this study is demonstrated, I am trying to know what the two doctors cited above think, not you, my dear Sir